image compression
Joint Autoregressive and Hierarchical Priors for Learned Image Compression
Recent models for learned image compression are based on autoencoders that learn approximately invertible mappings from pixels to a quantized latent representation. The transforms are combined with an entropy model, which is a prior on the latent representation that can be used with standard arithmetic coding algorithms to generate a compressed bitstream. Recently, hierarchical entropy models were introduced as a way to exploit more structure in the latents than previous fully factorized priors, improving compression performance while maintaining end-to-end optimization. Inspired by the success of autoregressive priors in probabilistic generative models, we examine autoregressive, hierarchical, and combined priors as alternatives, weighing their costs and benefits in the context of image compression. While it is well known that autoregressive models can incur a significant computational penalty, we find that in terms of compression performance, autoregressive and hierarchical priors are complementary and can be combined to exploit the probabilistic structure in the latents better than all previous learned models. The combined model yields state-of-the-art rate-distortion performance and generates smaller files than existing methods: 15.8% rate reductions over the baseline hierarchical model and 59.8%, 35%, and 8.4% savings over JPEG, JPEG2000, and BPG, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, our model is the first learning-based method to outperform the top standard image codec (BPG) on both the PSNR and MS-SSIM distortion metrics.
Causal Context Adjustment Loss for Learned Image Compression Minghao Han
The question of how to guide the auto-encoder to generate a more effective causal context benefit for the autoregressive entropy models is worth exploring. In this paper, we make the first attempt in investigating the way to explicitly adjust the causal context with our proposed Causal Context Adjustment loss (CCA-loss).
- North America > United States > California > Alameda County > Livermore (0.04)
- North America > United States > Tennessee > Anderson County > Oak Ridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > North Carolina > Durham County > Durham (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- Europe > Netherlands > North Holland > Amsterdam (0.04)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- Europe > Austria (0.04)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.93)
- North America > United States (0.14)
- Europe > Spain (0.04)
- Europe > Southeast Europe (0.04)
- (5 more...)
- Aerospace & Defense (0.68)
- Energy (0.47)
- Information Technology (0.46)
- Information Technology > Sensing and Signal Processing > Image Processing (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.46)
- Europe > Switzerland (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Asia > China > Jiangsu Province > Nanjing (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.28)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Orange County > Irvine (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)